Published in
PNAS, research conducted by scientists from CNRS Earth and Universe and ENS - PSL reveals that the future reduction of coral calcification, a consequence of climate change, could paradoxically strengthen COâ‚‚ absorption by the ocean. This negative climate feedback, still absent from current models, could slightly modify estimates of the global carbon budget.
True pillars of marine biodiversity, coral reefs are particularly vulnerable to ocean warming and acidification. Their calcification (formation of the calcium carbonate skeleton), essential to the formation of reef structures, is in rapid decline.
When they calcify, corals secrete carbonates and release COâ‚‚ into the seawater, which slightly reduces the ocean's capacity to absorb COâ‚‚.
If this trend continues, their net dissolution could occur even under moderate emission scenarios. Despite their ecological importance, these ecosystems are not represented in current climate models of the carbon cycle.
The authors used recent estimates on the sensitivity of coral calcification to climate change. They were thus able to deduce the modifications in seawater chemistry resulting from the anticipated decline in global reef calcification. Then, using an ocean biogeochemical model, they simulated the impact of these chemical changes on carbon uptake by the ocean under different emission scenarios, while accounting for the uncertainty in historical calcification rates.
A double-edged mechanism for the planet
According to the study, this future decline in coral calcification could increase the ocean carbon sink by up to 1.25 gigatonnes of COâ‚‚ per year by 2050. This would represent a 5% increase in the cumulative carbon absorption by the ocean during the 21st century compared to current estimates.
The increase in ocean carbon uptake linked to the decline in coral calcification constitutes a negative climate feedback, a concept that current climate models do not take into account. This could lead to an upward revision of the remaining carbon budget, particularly in the context of
the +2°C target set by the Paris Agreement.
But this potential "beneficial" effect on the climate cannot compensate for the loss of essential ecosystems. "Even though this work shows that the degradation of coral reefs can have some beneficial effects on the climate, we must not forget that it comes at an enormous cost in terms of biodiversity, coastal protection, and fishing. Environmental policy decisions clearly need to take much more into account than just the carbon aspect," recalls Alban Planchat, co-lead author. A warning to be considered in any environmental policy.