⛏️ Abundant European mining waste contains rare earths, but there is a problem...

Waste from former European coal mining activities contains rare earths. A study published in Scientific Reports analyzed four samples from Spain, Poland and Slovenia: the results show real mineral potential, but there is a problem... for now.

Rare earths encompass several elements used in magnets, electronics and certain energy technologies. Their total concentration varied from 159.72 to 221.89 parts per million depending on the sample. Here, one part per million corresponds to roughly one gram of material per tonne of waste.

A piece of coal in front of a coal-fired power plant.

A piece of coal in front of a coal-fired power plant.
Image Wikimedia

The richest sample came from the Spanish site of La Matona, with 221.89 parts per million. The researchers therefore selected it for additional tests: they tried to concentrate the rare earths using low-energy methods such as gravity, magnetism, static electricity or flotation.

These physical methods unfortunately produced only negligible enrichment. The rare earths were not concentrated in an easily separated fraction. Analyses show that they occur as rare, very fine mineral phases, closely mixed with quartz and minerals rich in aluminum and silicon.

The team also tested several chemical solutions to dissolve the targeted elements. Water and acetic acid, the main acid in vinegar, proved ineffective here too. Hydrochloric acid heated to 60 °C increased the dissolved amounts, but without reaching a level deemed suitable for practical recovery under the studied conditions.

These observations currently prevent the direct transformation of these residues into a new industrial source. The measured contents remain interesting for documenting European secondary resources. However, the low concentration and the close association with other minerals complicate the treatments and could increase the consumption of chemicals.

The study focuses on four specific materials and tests carried out in the laboratory. It therefore does not rule out other, more favorable coal wastes. Future work will need to target other sites or develop more selective processes.

GI
gimmick

In my opinion, the priority would be to test the dissolution with Beaujolais Nouveau.

BI
Biscotte

So these wastes are still stored on site? I wonder if reprocessing them could be useful even without recovering many rare earths.

Père Trottard

These rare earths, not so rare for some, are mainly useful for the miniaturization of our industrial components. Reserving them for medical research and physics would be more than enough without major polluting industries... In this way, we would soon have huge phones and big, chunky batteries in large automobiles! And so ???. We're changing gears, as we said, otherwise: damn the planet!!!

KR
Kroco_8

221 grams per ton if I understood correctly, that seems really low. Even with a better process, wouldn't the transport and treatment cost more than what we recover?

VI
vieuxcrabe

Kroco_8, that's also the question I'm asking myself. I knew the slag heaps of the North when they were mostly seen as mountains of waste. Today, they are sometimes found to have value, but if we have to move and process tons for a few hundred grams, the calculation must be tight.

TI
TitouB

But if the grains are too small, can't we grind them even more to separate them better? Or would that actually make things worse?

MO
Moka17

TitouB, actually, grinding more can sometimes release the useful grains, but if they are already very fine and mixed with other minerals, it can mostly complicate the separation and cost more energy.

GI
GigiZ

It would be useful to compare several spoil tips with exactly the same protocol. With only four samples, we could easily overlook a site that is much easier to exploit.

BI
Biscotte

I wonder what these grains look like under a microscope, can we really distinguish rare earths from other minerals by eye on the images?

avatar
QJ

The problem lies in the anthracite color of the materials.
I have some knowledge of spectral analysis for industrial flows, and as of today, for a 1 mm cube crushing result, it's not "top-tier"...

  • At 1 mm, you are at the lower physical limit of optical sorting/XRT systems by air ejection...
  • The anthracite color prevents the use of so-called "near-infrared" spectral analyzers; there is too much absorption, leaving us with a signal that is within the noise threshold of the best sensors on the market.

If the goal is to continuously measure the overall chemical composition of a flow, on a conveyor, without contact, then PGNAA spectrometry... But that costs a fortune and requires fine crushing, so the investment is very, very expensive.

The device bombards the crushed material flow with neutrons, causing the emission of gamma rays whose spectrum instantly reveals the elemental concentration.
It provides real-time data on ash content, moisture, carbon content (to evaluate the residual calorific value), sulfur (pyrite), and silica.

By subtraction, you get the ratio of high-value-added material to be extracted.
But you don't have a process yet to separate the material, and today the only solution is: the electric furnace.

In short, you have to crush, analyze the ratio, then go to the foundry; none of this is profitable and is far too polluting.

Who would want this kind of crusher and/or foundry near their home?

BI
Biscotte

And could we retrieve something else at the same time to make the processing profitable?